Understanding the NSW Guns for Hire Problem
Recent inquiries by the New South Wales corruption watchdog, known as Operation Rosny, have brought the region’s guns for hire problem into sharp focus by exposing how easily influential operatives moved through parliament corridors. According to reporting by The Guardian, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) revealed that a group of right-wing Liberal operatives, including Charles Perrottet, maintained extraordinary access to power. Icac alleged these operatives were paid $2m by developer Jean Nassif to advance his interests while remaining largely unregistered and undeclared as lobbyists.

The revelations detailed alarming activities, such as a subterranean campaign to discredit the building commissioner and attempts to unseat local councillors. Although only one of the key protagonists was a registered lobbyist subject to strict transparency rules, all of them leveraged personal relationships with former colleagues and bureaucrats to mix with powerful political figures.
The Minns Government’s Proposed Lobbying Legislation
In response to mounting pressure, the NSW Labor government led by Chris Minns introduced a bill aimed at addressing undeclared lobbying by third-party operatives. The legislation passed the lower house, though its future in the upper house remains uncertain ahead of upcoming elections.
Supporters note that the proposed bill contains several positive measures:
- Establishes the NSW Electoral Commission as the regulator for third-party lobbyists with enhanced investigative and audit powers.
- Extends transparency and registration rules to cover third-party interactions with local councils.
- Requires third-party lobbyists to disclose attendance at exclusive ministerial fundraising events.
Major Loopholes and Criticisms
Despite these additions, critics and watchdogs argue that the government’s approach falls well short of what Icac recommended five years ago. A primary concern is that the disclosure regime completely ignores in-house lobbyists—individuals employed directly by companies under titles such as government relations or corporate affairs. These in-house professionals make up roughly 80% of corporate influencers operating within government corridors.
Special Minister of State John Graham defended the exclusion, arguing that registering in-house staff would create unnecessary red tape because ministerial diaries already provide transparency. However, transparency advocates point out that in-house lobbyists are not legally bound to maintain detailed interaction records.
Furthermore, the legislation leaves out interactions with powerful ministerial chiefs of staff, who frequently act as vital policy and access conduits. Operation Rosny demonstrated how operatives successfully passed critical material through these staff channels without decision-makers realizing financial conflicts of interest.
Broader Political Reactions
Minor parties and legal experts have voiced strong opinions regarding the legislation’s limitations. The Greens introduced a private member’s bill seeking to implement comprehensive Icac recommendations, including stricter post-public-service cooling-off periods. Meanwhile, Centre for Public Integrity senior counsel Geoffrey Watson described the government bill as a step in the right direction while expressing regret over its lack of ambition.
Source: Icac’s dirt files expose NSW’s ‘guns for hire’ problem. But neither major party is serious about lobbying reform (source-feed timestamp 2026-11-12T22:21:26+00:00). AI-assisted report based on the cited linked article and its RSS feed; details were not independently verified.
Context matters. Read about our editorial standards and corrections policy.




Join the conversation